Tuesday, November 15, 2016

God Bless America - Part 2

This blog first posted one week after the 2016 Presidential Election. I'm reposting it now, because--
I suspect you'll see why as you read.
I made only minor edits.
Again, I suspect you'll see why as you read.
If you missed part one, it was re-posted last Monday. https://goo.gl/QdkKGD



The iconic song, "God Bless America" was written by Irving Berlin in 1943. Those were dark days for our country. Berlin's song was a wisp of hope for a desperate nation. Kate Smith was one of the first to sing the song on the radio--THE social media of the day.

The song's message is as true and needed today as it was the day it was written. It's the title of this two blog-post series for that reason.

God Bless America - Part 2

What I've Learned

In yesterday's blog, I pointed out that the November 8th, 2016, Presidential Election was, at the minimum, contentious. In a two-political-party system, there is always tension between candidates for any bipartisan office. The availability of social media for essentially everyone combined with the "make it a show for $$" approach of CNN to the "presidential debates" ensured over-stirring the pot in this regard at the national level.

There has been more than enough complaining about the candidates and the results of the election. [That continues two years later. In some ways, it's gotten worse. Photos of President Trump used in many newscasts too often show a scowl or surprised look, while opponents of the President are too often shown smiling.]
One candidate was described as being anywhere from "unqualified" to the "least qualified candidate ever."
One was labeled as "criminal" by some and "just another insider."
Of course, the supporters of either candidate did not use those terms.

I pointed out yesterday in Part 1 of this blog post the qualifications for the presidency in the US Constitution and the fact that "party politics" is not mentioned in that document.

Today's focus is on

  • American voters, 
  • National Presidential Election Day holiday, 
  • the Electoral College, and 
  • what I feel we, as American citizens, need to do now.


The American Voters

Nearly half of eligible voters (231,556,622 people) did not vote in the 2016 presidential election, according to data of early turnout rates compiled by the United States Election Project and crunched by Josh Nelson
The early data found that of the U.S. population:

  • 46.6% didn't vote 
  • 25.6% voted for Hillary Clinton 
  • 25.5% voted for Donald Trump 
  • 1.7% voted for Gary Johnson

You can see
  • nearly one-half eligible voters chose not to vote for the president of the United States.
  • Hillary Clinton barely won the very close popular vote.
  • Donald Trump was elected by only 1/4 of eligible voters.
As I write this, television news is reporting rioting in cities across the USA. "Dump Trump" is a common sign. "Trump is not my president," is a common phrase chanted.

I wonder what percentage of those rioting voted.

The percentage of eligible voters that voted in the 2016 Presidential Election ranged from 45% - 65%. Even those states with "high" turnouts, only 2/3 of the eligible voters chose to exercise that right.

Why?

General complacency is first on my non-scientifically-generated list. Non-voters think, "I'll show them what I think by not voting. That will send them a message." Reality: It does not.
States in the Pacific and Hawaiian time zones hear election results from other parts of the country up to three hours before the polls close.

I'm sure there are scores of other excuses given by non-voters. In my mind, there isn't any justifiable reason for not voting.

What can be done about the sorry voter turnout?


National Presidential Election Holiday

Living in California, I know what it's like to be sitting in my home watching the five o'clock news when the national media declare, "Whatta Candidate is three electoral votes away from clinching the election."

California polls don't close for three hours! No announcement like that should be made while polls are open anywhere in the USA!

Many California voters planned on voting on their way home from work. Many of those will choose not to vote because "my vote doesn't count." That justification for not voting is invalid. Only one item on the ballot is impacted by that announcement

But the turnout in California is impacted by those announcements. Voter turnout in CA is nearly always lower than every other state.

I'm not the first to propose the idea of a National Presidential Election Holiday. I do think its time has come.

What means:

  1. Election day is a national holiday, just like the 4th of July.
  2. It happens on the second Tuesday of November every four years.
  3. Polls are open from 6:00AM to 8:00PM in every state.
  4. No votes can be counted anywhere in the USA until the polls are closed in ALL STATES. 
  5. National election coverage by the media cannot begin until the polls are closed in ALL STATES.

Unfair! Unfair! 

The cry goes up from 

  • media pundits--mostly East Coasters.
  • broadcast networks--we can't be first to make the call.


Tough toenails. National Presidential Election Holiday levels the field for all candidates and ballot measures in all states.

Another leveling of the playing field for presidential candidates would be 


Eliminating the Electoral College

Designed for a time when media was minimal, the Electoral College was designed to help elect the most qualified candidate as President of the USA.

Voters did not vote for a specific candidate--technically we still don't! Voters elect "electors" who are charged with voting for the candidate they think is most qualified.

"Today, all presidential electors are chosen by the voters, but, in the early republic, more than half the states chose electors in their legislatures, thus eliminating any direct involvement by the voting public in the election. This practice changed rapidly after the turn of the nineteenth century, however, as the right to vote was extended to an ever-wider segment of the population.
...
In fact, the balance of opinion by constitutional scholars is that, once electors have been chosen, they remain constitutionally free agents, able to vote for any candidate who meets the requirements for President and Vice President. Faithless electors have, however, been few in number (in the 20 century, one each in 1948, 1956, 1960, 1968, 1972, 1976, 1988, and 2000), and have never influenced the outcome of a presidential election."

The above quotations are from http://www.history.com/topics/electoral-college. I emphasized a portion to point out the reality of our current system. In fact, did you know...

In 1824John Quincy Adams was elected president despite not winning either the popular vote or the electoral vote. Andrew Jackson was the winner in both categories. Jackson received 38,000 more popular votes than Adams and beat him in the electoral vote 99 to 84. Despite his victories, Jackson didn’t reach the majority 131 votes needed in the Electoral College to be declared president. In fact, neither candidate did. The decision went to the House of Representatives, which voted Adams into the White House.
In 1876Rutherford B. Hayes won the election (by a margin of one electoral vote), but he lost the popular vote by more than 250,000 ballots to Samuel J. Tilden.
In 1888Benjamin Harrison received 233 electoral votes to Grover Cleveland’s 168, winning the presidency. But Harrison lost the popular vote by more than 90,000 votes.
In 2000George W. Bush was declared the winner of the general election and became the 43rd president, but he didn’t win the popular vote either. Al Gore holds that distinction, garnering about 540,000 more votes than Bush. However, Bush won the electoral vote, 271 to 266.
From USA Today
As of November 14, 2016, Hillary Clinton is winning the popular vote in the 2016 election.
With today's technology, the popular vote should determine the winner.

Eliminating the Electoral College requires a Constitutional Amendment. It's an Amendment that is overdue.

[Since I posted this, I've received a number of thoughtful responses opposing elimination of the Electoral College. I think that splitting each state's Electoral votes by the percentage each candidate received in that state would be enough to allow every voter's vote to impact the final results equally with every other voter's vote.]

What I feel we, as American citizens, need to do now

We live in a great country. In spite of the "flaws" that are being emphasized by many groups, hundreds of thousands of refugees are waiting for a chance--or crossing USA borders illegally--to enter the USA. Significant numbers of legal immigrants become US Citizens. (47% of legal immigrants were naturalized in 2014)

If you were born an American Citizen, count your blessings.

"But, I don't like who was elected!"
In many countries, you don't get to vote. Period. Count your blessings and support the office of President.

"Things are getting worse in the USA."
Do something to change that. Count your blessings, and quit sitting and complaining.
  • Find a group that is working to improve conditions in your neighborhood, city, state, or the country in general. 
  • Join that group. 
  • Work with that group to bring about change.
I am not a historian. I do like history. I'm old enough to see changes in our country that are troubling to me. But those observations are not new ones. Check this link for a list of complaints--mostly about the youth of the time--from as early as 800 BC.

That doesn't mean I'm willing to accept what's happening without doing something.

I taught high school for most of the 1970s, all of the 1980s, half of the 1990s, half of the 2000s, and the early part of the 2010s. Changes in students over that time were significant. I witnessed those changes more directly than many of you did. 

I still believe in our youth and our country. Most of my former students prove why I should.

I pray for our national, state, and local leaders every week.

A Christian nation does not require a Christian government. 

A Christian nation requires Christians acting with compassion, love, and tolerance as they become Christ's hands, feet, and physical presence for people in need.

Prayer changes things.
More importantly, prayer changes people! Changed people and change agents.

One of my prayers is
God bless America, land that I love
Stand beside her and guide her
Through the night with the light from above
From the mountains to the prairies
To the oceans white with foam
God bless America, my home sweet home
From the mountains to the prairies
To the oceans white with foam
God bless America, my home sweet home
God bless America, my home sweet home
Irving Berlin
God Bless America lyrics © Peermusic Publishing

I invite you to pray for God to bless America along with me and millions of others.
I invite you to show compassion on the next marginalized person you encounter.

  • Speak with her/him.
  • Listen to what he/she has to say.
  • Don't judge.
  • Don't try to explain issues away.
  • Ask how you can pray for her/him and his/her family.
  • Do what you are led to do--do what you can--to help if a need is expressed.
Over the last year, I made friends with a security guard on a construction project. 
  • He is from Somalia. 
  • He is studying to become a US Citizen. 
  • He supports his family by working horrific hours for low pay in a job he cannot afford to quit.
  • He asked me not to contact his employer about his situation. He could not afford to be fired.
  • I got him some contact information of agencies who might be able to help him and the others "employed" by the company.
  • The job ended. 
  • He waved as he drove by me at the end of his final shift.
  • His name is Essa. 
  • I pray for him and his family every day. My prayer includes seeing him again.
One of the offshoots of the rancor in the last election is a genuine fear in may marginalized populations. 

I end with this.
  • I listened to part of President-elect Trump's victory speech.
  • I listened to part of Hillary Clinton's speech she gave the day after the election.
  • I was encouraged by the words and tone of both speeches.
  • It made me wonder why they both chose not to be like that during the election. 

I would have loved to hear meaningful dialog and thoughtful ideas presented with a calm assurance of correctness throughout the campaign.
I wonder why WE didn't. 

Next week I'll be back to my regular blog sequence. Tuesday will be Day in the Life of a Science Fiction Writer: Clauses, Conjunctions, and Closing Comments on Commas

Follow me on Twitter: @CRDowningAuthor 
My website is: www.crdowning.com 
E-mail: crd.author@gmail.com







Monday, November 14, 2016

God Bless America - Part 1

This blog first posted one week after the 2016 Presidential Election. I'm reposting it now, because--
I suspect you'll see why as you read.
I made only minor edits.
Again, I suspect you'll see why as you read.

The iconic song, "God Bless America" was written by Irving Berlin in 1943. Those were dark days for our country. Berlin's song was a wisp of hope for a desperate nation. Kate Smith was one of the first to sing the song on the radio--THE social media of the day.

The song's message is as true and needed today as it was the day it was written. It's the title of this two blog-post series for that reason.

God Bless America - Part 1

Post Election Pontification

I've been aware of every Presidential election since 1960 when John F. Kennedy defeated Richard Nixon. My 5th-grade class watched the first televised Presidential debates in black and white, IN THE DAYTIME. Unlike this year, they were debates, not debacles. Each candidate spoke in turn to the camera in front of him. Questions were actually answered instead of speaking points delivered regardless of the prompt. There was no shouting. They were debates in the truest sense of the word.



Since I've been aware of presidential elections--see the previous paragraph--I remember dire predictions by both political parties as to the disaster awaiting the USA if the "the opponents' candidate" was elected. Specifically

  • John F. Kennedy was the first Catholic elected. I don't know why, but this was supposed to have been the worse case scenario for a candidate.
  • Lyndon Johnson wasn't anyone's first choice as a presidential candidate. He inherited the office and ran as an incumbent against Barry Goldwater in 1964. Much of the rhetoric involving the Vietnam War was vitriolic. Goldwater lost in one of the most lopsided elections ever held.
  • Ronald Reagan was denounced for being an actor, not a politician. That happened in California in the 1960s when he ran for governor and again in the 1980s when he ran for president. Time will ultimately determine his place in the hierarchy of both offices. As it stands today, he's esteemed by many historians.
  • The "Florida fiasco" campaign of George W. Bush vs. Al Gore was contentious even before "hanging chad" was a term.
  • Now, Trump vs. Hillary.

Over the years I've been voting, mostly as the result of expanded media capabilities, presidential campaigns have evolved into media events. This year has seen more complaining about the one candidate by the other both personally and politically than I can remember. Detractors described one candidate anywhere from "unqualified" to the "least qualified candidate ever." The other candidate was labeled as "criminal" by some and "just another insider" by her detractors. Of course, supporters of either candidate did not use those terms in their descriptions.

As "luck" would have it, I am currently revising a student laboratory kit for re-issue. The kit, Mystery at 323 Maple, is convoluted "Who dun it?" I used it at Monte Vista when I taught a "forensics-type" class. This is from the Teacher Note section.
Ward's Mystery at 323 Maple kit consists of six stations through which students rotate as teams while they attempt to determine "who did it" for one of six different crimes at one of six different Maple addresses in a mythical town.
According to the scenario, six “bags of clues” were delivered to the police by an anonymous source. Each team receives an envelope—their Crime Scene Evidence Envelope (CSEE)—with a different set of evidence collected at one of the six crime scenes, including evidence from one of the bags. Each team performs the same tests on the contents of their envelope. If you wish, each team will discover a unique solution to their mystery.

The purpose of the kit is to allow students to demonstrate problem-solving skills while simultaneously demonstrating mastery of certain laboratory skills and techniques. Since no specific science discipline is emphasized, this kit is ideal for integrated science classes, as well as any traditional class where any or all of the laboratory skills required are taught or emphasized. It is an excellent “end of course” activity for any science class. It is a critical thinking alternative for AP classes after the exams.
Anyway, I was in the mood to investigate. So, I did.
I found that there have been many contentious elections in the 240 years of United States' history. You can check what one group thought were the "top seven" at: 
http://www.history.com/news/history-lists/7-most-contentious-u-s-presidential-elections

I also found out what qualifies a person to be the President of the United States.



Qualifications for the Office of President from US Constitution, Article II, Section 1

Age and Citizenship requirements 

  1. No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; 
  2. neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.


That's it. Nothing about having been governor or senator or mayor or having even run for another office. So I looked some more. Did you know that the vast majority of what we consider politics today is "unconstitutional"--that is, not in the seminal document of our government?
BTW: The above photo is the entire document. 

The Cabinet. Now one of the mainstays of any president.
PACs. Now considered essential by both parties and all candidates.
Lobbyists. Not invented.
Committees/Chairs of Committees. Not addressed.
Political Parties. Not a word. 
Executive Orders. Silence.
Congressional Representatives/Senators DO NOT have to abide by the laws they pass. I suspect that was about as far from the thoughts of the time as the second closest star to Earth is from our sun.

To reiterate, most of what we call "politics" today is NOTHING like the vision of the Founding Fathers.

Most of what I see in politics today is a continuing series of manipulations in order to get reelected by

  • Adding "pork" to bills that are a certainty to pass.
  • Voting party lines regardless of the issue.
  • Voting the way they want and not voting the way their constituents want.
  • Not admitting that an automatic COLA is a raise like their constituents have to do.
  • Accepting a pension after serving a single term in office.
  • Remaining in office an entire lifetime.
When our nation was founded, the idea behind representative government assumed a rotating system of elected representatives from throughout the states. An individual would quit their job and go to Washington for a season, come home and work, and return to Washington again. After two of these cycles, the Representatives would usually choose to stay home. Senators had six cycles to endure before they left office. Comparing the jobs of the first U.S. Congress to the 2011-2012 Congress shows that over 1/3 of the 112th Congress considered "public servant" (AKA elected to office) as their job compared to 5% of the members of the 1st Congress.

First U.S. Congress (1789–1791)
91 total members
65 representatives
26 senators

34 lawyers
15 soldiers
12 planters/farmers
11 businessmen/merchants
6 clergymen
5 statesmen/career politicians
4 physicians
3 teachers
1 diplomat

112th Congress (2011–2012)
539 total members*
435 representatives
100 senators
6 non-voting members

209 businessmen and women
208 public servants
200 lawyers
81 educators
34 agricultural professionals (including two almond orchard owners)
32 medical professionals (including doctors, veterinarians, ophthalmologists, dentists, a psychiatrist, psychologists, an optometrist, and nurses)
17 journalists
9 accountants
9 scientists
9 social workers
9 military reserves
7 law enforcement officers (including FBI and Border Patrol)
5 ministers
4 pilots
4 Peace Corps volunteers
2 professional football players
2 screenwriters
1 firefighter
1 astronaut
1 documentary filmmaker
1 comedian


In a departure from my normal blog posting, part 2 of this blog will post tomorrow. In that post, I will address the Electoral College and give my thoughts on what Americans need to do now.

Thanks for reading this. I invite you back tomorrow next week.
Follow me on Twitter: @CRDowningAuthor
My website is: www.crdowning.com

Monday, November 7, 2016

A Science Guy’s Almanac. Coaching Memories (continued) - Track & Field – Boy’s Track


A Science Guy’s Almanac. Year 2. November 7, 2016
Coaching Memories (continued) - Track & Field – Boy’s Track

My second, and last, track coaching assignment working with the distance runners. I am not a distance runner. I have never been a distance runner. I never wanted to be a distance runner. Now, thanks to my spinal fusion and more recent laminectomy, I will never be a distance runner.

The good news was: Distance runners love to run.

The boy distance runners weren’t all that interested in my coaching. My memories of them are only two.
1.             Once a week, we ran quarter mile sprints. Sweetwater Springs Blvd, the street on which Monte Vista High is located, is sloped as it passes the front of the school and the track/football field stadium.


  • Take a look at the map. Near the top on the right side, you will see a street named Loma Lane. That’s a driveway to an elementary school. It’s also directly across to the entrance to Monte Vista’s parking lot. At the bottom, you will see a large field with softball/baseball diamonds on it. The distance from the bottom edge of those ball fields—the lowest elevation point in front of the school—and Loma Lane—the highest elevation we are concerned with—is 0.25 miles.
  • All the distance runners trotted down to the end of the ball diamonds. I went with them. One of the other coaches dropped his arm while blowing his whistle, and the runners sprinted uphill to school entrance. I sprinted with them. Back in the mid-1970s, I was still young and in reasonable shape. I could keep up with all the girls and some of the guys on that sprint.
  • The runners trotted back down the hill. I waited at the top.
  • The other coach dropped his arm while blowing his whistle, and the runners sprinted uphill to school entrance again. I trotted back down the hill with them.
  • The other coach dropped his arm while blowing his whistle, and the runners sprinted uphill to school entrance a third time. Once again, I ran with them. Since this was my second sprint and the runners’ third sprint, I could keep my pace from the first sprint.
  • We always ran six of the quarter mile hill sprints. I always ran three of those. By the sixth sprint the runners ran—my third sprint—I looked pretty fast. I’m pretty sure the runners knew I was “cheating,” but I think they appreciated my efforts.

2.            The CIF 4 X 440 Relay. The shortest “distance” race was the 440-yard “dash.” It was described to me as the hardest of the track events because you have to run as fast as you can for one-quarter mile. I believe that. Oh, back in the 70s, track and field in the USA still measured in yards. Now, all events are measured in metric units.
  • We had one STUD 440 runner. When he ran his head never bobbed up or down. One of the other coaches pointed that out. I held a 3x5 card up in front of my eyes with the top of the card aligned with the top of our runner’s head. I watched him run. I never saw anything but his hair above the card. But, I digress.
  • We also had two pretty good 440-yard runners.
  • The title of this section is the 4 X 440. If you’re counting runners along with me, or even if you’re not counting, we’re at three.
  • Our 4th 440 runner was a determined young man who’s running style is best described as whirling dervish—about as opposite of our STUD as you could be.
  • I have no memory of any of his races until we qualified for the California Interscholastic Federation (CIF) San Diego Section’s finals. We qualified by finishing winning our league championship in the event. All I remember about going to the CIF meet is that we weren’t given a chance to do anything but finish the race.
  • We decided to use our STUD on the anchor leg as we had all year. We had one of our pretty good runners run the first leg and the other run the third leg. That left leg #2 for the dervish.
  • Our lead runner did well. He finished in the top five.
  • Dervish took the baton and started running. I’m sure that several members of the audience were afraid he’d collapse before he finished his leg. He didn’t collapse until after he’d handed off the baton. In fact, he’d maintained our position as the #5 team. The third leg runner dropped us back one place. When the STUD took the baton, we were in a distant 6th place, out of medal contention.
  • STUD did his thing. He passed the runner in fifth place and probably would have caught the 4th place runner if the leg had been 450-yards long. We medaled. I was fired-up.
  • It was emotional to see the relay team support dervish after the event. He’d given his all—and they knew it.


“My” girl runners were more tolerant of my coaching deficiencies. More on what is sometimes known as the distaff side of my track coaching in the next Almanac blog.

Next Almanac: Coaching memories continued – Track & Field – Girl’s Track

Follow me on Twitter: @CRDowningAuthor
My website is: www.crdowning.com