Tuesday, May 3, 2016

Prompt #1714 Between the Shadow-times updated


Periodically, I write to a daily prompt found at thewritingreader.com. This is one of those. I hope it brightens your day as much as the experience brightened Gwendolyn Mathers'.

Gwendolyn Mathers let her body slide down the tiled wall of her oversized shower. Warm water cascaded over her body from the rain showerhead her husband had insisted be a part of the nearly twenty square-foot enclosure.

She stared, unseeing, at the array of side shower jets that wrapped around her at varying heights. Those, too, had been essential parts of the luxury shower system advertised as “a relaxing, refreshing refuge for couples.”

What it had become was a reminder of happier times.

She knew she wasn’t depressed. I am exhausted. I don’t know how much longer I can keep doing this.

The ping of the timer she’d set rallied her mental energy. She stood, pressed the button on the foaming soap dispenser, and lathered up. She knew that she’d taken too long to still wash and condition her hair.

She sighed.

Removing the hand-held showerhead from its mooring, she rinsed her body. One turn of the master water valve stemmed the flow of hot liquid. She pushed the all-glass shower door open with her hip and stepped out onto the memory foam bathmat. After drying her body and partially drying her hair, she wound her shoulder-length hair into around her head and wrapped a towel around it.

“You’ve got the sultry middle-east look down this morning,” she told her reflection in the mirror. Even though she knew there was no one else in the house, she pulled a short cotton robe on before she opened the door to the bedroom.

After dressing and drying her hair, she headed to the stairs. A clear line of darkness split the staircase in half midway between the top landing and the bottom step.

Funny, she thought, I don’t think I’ve ever seen this before. I didn’t think there was enough sun in this stairwell to cast a shadow this time of the morning.

She took a deep breath and stepped off the landing.

One. Two. Three. Four. Five. Six.

As her foot contacted the seventh step, she realized she’d been subconsciously counting the steps. She looked down. Brilliant sunlight bathed her foot in glorious gold hues.

“It’s dazzling!” She said aloud.

Embarrassed by her vocalization, she took the next two steps as fast as she could.

Something compelled her to stop.

What’s going on here? I feel… Why I feel better! Better than in a long time.

She looked down. The line between sunlight and shadow now cut her mid-thigh. She turned and looked back up the stairs.

I don’t get this? It’s pitch black up there. 

She shivered.

She pranced down the remaining steps. By the time she reached the hardwood that covered the entire first floor of her home, she was humming.

The phone rang.

She skipped to the kitchen counter and snatched her smartphone from its charging cradle.

“This is Gwen!”

“Mrs. Mathers?”

“None other.”

“Um, of course. This is Nurse Doring.”

“Ah, yes. You’re one of Hank’s nurses. How are you?”

“Um, why, I-I’m fine,” the nurse stammered. What’s up with Gwendolyn? She’s never this perky.

“And, Hank?”

“That’s what I called about.”

“Okay. I’m ready for your news.”

“You’ll want to come down as quickly as you can,” Nurse Doring instructed. “Your husband’s shown signs of emerging from the coma. Very promising signs.”

“Oh, thank you! Thank you! I’ll be right there!”

Gwen snatched up her car keys with one hand and punched the garage door opener with the other. She shoved a coffee pod into the machine, slapped the lid closed, stuck her insulated mug under the spout, and started the brew cycle.

She hummed as she pulled two granola bars from their box in the pantry. By the time she pushed open the door to the garage with her hip, she was ready to take on the world.

She never could explain why she turned and look back at the staircase. But when she did, she saw that the sun illuminated the entire length.

That’s not possible. There’s no way the sun moved that far in that short of time.

Without a second thought, she let the door close behind her. It didn’t matter if the shadows returned.


I’m spending today, which is going to be a fantastic day, thank you very much, between the shadow-times.



Monday, May 2, 2016

A Science Guy’s Almanac #23. Year 2. Wienerwhistles

A Science Guy’s Almanac #23. Year 2. April 18, 2016
Wienerwhistles 

Last week, I featured the Oscar Meyer Wienermobile and the coveted whistles its occupants passed out to us kids. I think the corporate rule was “one Wienerwhistle per kid,” because getting two of them was an uncommon occurrence. Sometimes, if the crowd was big enough, and the Wienermobile stayed for two days, you might score one on each day.

For those of you youngsters reading this, I’m talking late 1950s-early 1960s here. Our TV antenna might manage 4 stations—ABC, CBS, NBC, and an independent English station in Mexico. But, we only got all four on the same day when all the stars were aligned. So, the Wienermobile was a big deal.

The design of the whistle is simple.


  1. Start with an outside of a round-ended closed cylinder.
  2. Drill a hole in each end of the cylinder.
  3. Drill a hole about one-third of the way down the length of the cylinder.
  4. Cut a wedge-shaped opening closer to the other end than the previous hole, but make sure it is open in the same direction as the previous hole.
  5. While neither example shows all the holes, all four are present in every Wienerwhistles.


Once you got your Wienerwhistle, you had to play it. Over. And over. And over. Much to the dismay of adults in your household.

To play the Wienerwhistle,
  1. Hold the end of the whistle closest to the wedge-shaped opening between your lips with the wedge-shaped opening facing up.
  2. Blow into the hole on between your lips. A sound will emerge.
  3. Cover the end hole with a finger.
  4. Repeat Step #2. A different sound will emerge.
  5. Remove your finger from the end hole and use it to cover the hole facing up.
  6. Repeat Step #2. Yet another different sound will emerge.
  7. Finally, keep one finger covering the hole facing up and use another finger go cover the hole in the end.
  8. Repeat Step #2. Violà! A fourth sound will emerge.

You now know the potential of the instrument.

Notice I used the term sound and not note for the compression waves generated by your moving breath. That’s because I don’t know if they are notes. I’ve never heard anything like music played on one. Mostly what the Wienerwhistle produces are annoying sounds. Remember the previous sentence.

In most houses, the life span of a Wienerwhistle was less than 24-hours. No matter how clever you were at hiding your whistle, sometime during the first night whistle spent in your house, something like what follows would occur. I’m using Dad as the designated parent because I’m pretty sure that’s the way it was in my house when wienerwhistles were concerned.

Typical Sequence of Events the Night After Receiving a Wienerwhistle
  1. Hide your whistle in your underwear drawer before going to bed.
  2. Wrap it in a sock or a pair of tighty-whities.
  3. Push it all the way to the back of the drawer.
  4. Cover the hidden whistle with other underwear.

After he’s sure you’ve gone to sleep,
  1. Dad will enter your room.
  2. With the stealth that a cat-burgler would envy, he will search your entire room: closets, drawers, boxes, baseball card stashes, comic book racks. If it has a place to hide something, he’ll search it.
  3. He will find the source of the annoying sounds—your Wienerwhistle.
  4. He will take his prize out into the hallway or living room.
  5. He will drop in on the carpet.
  6. He will smash the Wienerwhistle to smithereens with his shoe-covered foot.
  7. He will go to bed.


In the morning, when you wake up and can’t find your Wienerwhistle, 
You will ask your parents,
“Have you seen my Wienerwhistle?”

Dad will answer,
“No. But I felt it when I stepped on the thing in my bare feet last night. I think I broke. I warned you to keep it off the floor.”

You know you have no chance of winning an argument about what really happened. So, you go to your friends and see if they were any more successful than you were at hiding their whistle(s).

Chances are all they can offer you is a handful of broken plastic pieces and a tube of airplane glue.

PS. I was going to record me playing my Wienerwhistle and link it as an MP3 file. But, my wife says she hasn’t seen it in a long time.

Next Almanac post: Duncan Yo-yos and the Yo-yo Masters

Follow me on Twitter: @CRDowningAuthor
My website is: www.crdowning.com

Tuesday, April 26, 2016

Reviews, Reviewers, and Reviewing – Part 3

April 26, 2016
Reviews, Reviewers, and Reviewing – Part 3

As much as you try, you’re probably not going to get as many reviews as you’d like to get. Once you get above 30 reviews on Amazon, you’re likely to get contacted by various individuals with deals to help publicize that book. I rarely check on these. The one’s I have checked on are very similar. They don’t offer much more than I’m already doing.

Of course, you’d like to get all 4-Star or 5-Star reviews. If your book gets only 5-Star reviews, I’m not sure that’s a good thing. The implication is that EVERYONE who read the book loved it. That’s not true. There are readers who won’t publish their review if it’s not 5-Stars because they don’t want to hurt the book or the author. But, a mix of review levels is more realistic. I think you have a better chance to attract readers with an average rating of 4-5-Stars than with a 5-Star rating with 100% 5-Star reviews.

Now, it’s time to get really real.

You’re going to get bad reviews. Hopefully not too many, but you will get them. What do you do with them?

My first novel, Traveler's HOT L - The Time Traveler's Resort, was awarded


in the science fiction category in 2014. I was on a high.

In late summer of 2014, Publishers Weekly began offering reviews of books from Indie publishers. I submitted Traveler’s HOT L. In all honesty, I was looking to get one or two sentences or phrases I could use in publicity. I didn’t get a single word that I would be able to use.

Few people I know have seen the review. I did not put it up anywhere. I’ve decided to print it in its entirety below. Commentary I wrote soon after receiving the review follows. It is based on the highlighting colors. This post resumes this blog after that commentary.

Booklife Review: 10/1/14

A rundown hotel hides a HOT L (Harmonious Overlap of Time Location), a nexus for time travel, in a series of stories that lack the execution to deliver on the premise. 
Debut novelist Downing’s conceptual framework is ambitious, sending readers into a medieval historical, two crime stories, and the book’s own alternate-universe sequel, but there’s nothing new in these familiar settings. PI Phil Mamba tries to catch a murderous politician in his past and inevitably ends up altering the future; no one believes the boy who says that his dolls can speak when, of course, they can. By the time Jesus is referred to as a temporal anomaly, it’s all too much, especially given how often explanations of theory and verbose descriptions (“he spoke with tenderness tinged with resignation”) slow the narrative. The recurring characters who direct the HOT L lack personality, limited to droll remarks and clichés such as “smooth the now-wrinkled time fabric.” Nearly every opportunity to treat these concepts originally has been missed. (BookLife)

My first reaction was disappointment. I can’t imagine anyone not being disappointed after receiving what is, essentially, a dismissal of a project of theirs.

Everyone is entitled to her/his opinion. This individual clearly does not like my style of writing. That’s fair—it is, after all, an opinion.

However, I am now somewhere between perplexed with and angry at some of what is written—because some of it is wrong.

Points.
No one in this book goes back and does anything to change the future. Both Mamba and Michael restore the original timelines. This is more than a technicality. No future is altered. This is a point of angriness for me by misrepresentation of the book's content.

In Battle, three individuals are described as having disappeared from the timeline before Rose goes missing. Jesus disappears from the timeline. He’s never referred to as a temporal anomaly. It is the Ascension that is referenced. His presence on Earth is never questioned. A second point of angriness for me by misrepresentation of the book's content.

I think this is wrong. Most readers comment on the originality of the ideas. 

Specifically missing from the statement in the review is any mention of what I can defend as original ideas about time travel:
  • The method of travel. Ripples, DNA stimulus,
  • The fact that only specific items travel. No artifacts in either direction, consequences for taking artifacts.
  • The fact that travelers return to original timeline with a real time lapse for the time they miss in nearly all cases.
  • The fact that they don’t know how this all began. The premise of DNA Trek.

Collectively, these comprise my third point of angriness. This makes me suspect that the reviewer was not a science fiction aficionado and wonder why (s)he was assigned this book to review. 

I disagaree. Each character has a unique personality that is reinforced in every story. Chronos is a bit of a tease. Eternity is a literalist. Epoch is a legalist. Tempus is learning how to co-exist with humanity. However, this is now my opinion. It is a point of perplexity.

I guess the bottom line is still disappointment. But now, my disappointment is in the lack of content integrity of the review. Much of what is written is a misrepresentation of the book.

Blog Post (Continued)
I don’t read this review often. I do, however, read it on occasion for a number of reasons. It reminds me that
  • when I do a review, I need to be fair. I also need to be very certain that what I write does not present any opinion of the book being reviewed based on only my like or dislike of either the genre or the book itself.
  • life is not fair. At least life doesn’t always follow my definition of fairness.
  • I take a chance every time I send a book out for review.
  • to review my work looking for what I might do to make my ideas as original as I can.
  • all characters need to be multidimensional.


Since this review, I’ve written other books. The book I have out now for pre-review and copy-editing is the best I’ve ever done. While much of that improvement is the result of a hard-working publicist whose goal is to help authors to be the best they can be, (http://www.frazierpublicrelations.com/), a reasonable share is because I never want to read a review like this again for one of my books.

Bottom Lines For This Series on Reviews, Reviewers, Reviewing
  1. Authors need to help other authors by reviewing other author’s books.
  2. Reviews should be honest and reflect the content and characteristics of the book more than the personal preferences of the reviewer.
  3. Believing only what’s said in good reviews is stupid.
  4. Turn a bad review into a learning experience. Profit from what was pointed out by working to avoid those problems in future works.


Next blog: Lessons Learned from Young Writers

Follow me on Twitter: @CRDowningAuthor and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CRDowningAuthor

My website is: www.crdowning.com


e-mail: crd.author@gmail.com