Monday, March 19, 2018

Almanac. Thoughts on Presenting at Conventions


This series of blogs is written in past tense because I don't think I'll be presenting at any other conferences.

I’ve presented over 100 content sessions, mostly science strategies, at science conventions for National Science Teachers Association Conventions, National Association of Biology Teachers Convention, California State Science Teachers Association Convention, San Diego Science Educators Association Convention, and Association of Christian Schools International Conference, among others.

Locations of those conferences are varied.
Arizona: Phoenix
California: San Diego, Los Angeles, Sacramento, Anaheim, Long Beach, and Temecula
Colorado: Denver
Florida: Orlando
Georgia: Atlanta
Hawaii: Honolulu
Illinois: Chicago
Indiana: Indianapolis
Louisiana: New Orleans
Massachusetts: Boston
Michigan: Detroit
Missouri: Kansas City
Nevada: Los Vegas, Reno
North Carolina: Raleigh
Oregon: Portland
Texas: Austin, Dallas
Utah: Salt Lake City
Washington: Seattle
Washington, D.C.

Topics include
Critical Thinking, Coordinated Science, Classroom Techniques, Questioning Strategies, Closure, Assessment, Kinesthetic Activities, and Learning Centers for teachers of all levels.

Workshop titles are designed to get attendees to read the description of the session. These sessions were generally 60-minutes in length.
A is for Analogy." Describes, supports, and illustrates the use of teacher-generated and student-generated analogies in the presentation of content material.
Classroom Management Strategies for the High School Science Class – Session objectives are to provide concrete strategies and processes to help new/novice science teachers include more laboratory experiences in their courses.
"From Dead Fish to Forensics - A model for developing and implementing an integrated science program." & "Making Connections - A model integrated science program." - Describes development and implementation of four core semesters and two elective semesters of integrated science for 9th-12th-grade students.
It’s Late at the Estate – Describes how to incorporate creative writing activities into science classes to teach investigative skills.
Kinesthetic is Kool – Demonstrates and explains four different kinesthetic life science activities. Participants “do” one complete activity.
Learning Centers in 60 Minutes? I don't believe it! – Focuses on constructing and using learning centers in elementary classrooms by providing samples and examples.
Pedagogical Alchemy & What Do You Do If Betty Crocker Wrote Your Lab Book - Describes how to move laboratory activities from “cookbook” style toward inquiry style—steps in the process of developing open-ended labs are discussed.
PReP (Peer Review Process) Your Classes – By participating in several examples of peer review and learning how to modify existing assignments to allow for this process with students, participants learn the power of this procedure.
Science at “C” Level: A Creative, Cooperative, Cross-disciplinary Approach to Critical Thinking & Stylin’ in Science - Participants are introduced to a method of teaching critical thinking skills incorporating creativity and cooperative learning strategies in a series of cross-disciplinary exercises designed to reach a wide variety of learning styles.
Standards-Based Science Portfolios – Discusses the process Great Oak High School is pursuing in determining if students meet academic standards.
THE END: How to add closure to your student learning experiences - Sample closure activities for single class assignments, long-term assignments and units of study, semester, year, and course sequence are described and demonstrated.
They've inquired, now how do I know what they know? - Participants experience a portion of an inquiry lab,  discuss what might have been learned by students through the experience, and learn to create rubrics for several types of learnings which might have resulted from the lab experience.
Tricks from an Old Dog - I share strategies and techniques gleaned and developed during the 27 years I’ve taught science, including grouping strategies, time-saving techniques, and management ideas.
Tune up Your Teaching & “Open-ended questions are fine for some students, but mine can’t do them” - Focuses on questioning strategies: specifically how to change classroom questions from closed-ended to open-ended while teaching students the skills and techniques required to answer higher-level questions.

Descriptions of the sessions are designed to get attendees to the session, if for no other reason but to find out what kind of a presenter is this? Most had length limits on descriptions of around 25 words. See if you can match a title above to the descriptions below.
Step-by-step instructions for how to create assignments and assessments for diverse populations will be provided.  Your brain will be very active in this session.
You will participate in a typical lesson demonstration, take home reproducible materials, and learn how to create a lesson of this type of your own.
Too many activities, units, semesters, even school years just end—students are left with a sense of “Well, it’s over, but why did we do it?” This session provides concrete examples how to bring closure to your classroom.
I will share grouping strategies, time-saving techniques, and management ideas gleaned and developed during the 40 years I have taught science. I LOVE new teachers!!
Movement is a powerful learning stimulus for students of diverse populations. Come, be “moved” 1) by the demonstrations; 2) to “move” your classes too.
Routines and procedures to effectively manage your classroom and laboratory experiences will be discussed and demonstrated. A valuable session for new teachers.
Peer review of assignments is a powerful classroom tool. Participate in several examples and learn how to modify existing assignments to allow for this process.

Sessions longer than 60-minutes allowed longer descriptions.
Too many laboratory books read more like cookbooks than science books.  They provide prescribed laboratory procedures that lead to predictable results.  The only thought required of students depends on the write-up assigned by the teacher.  Many (most?) laboratory exercises are still “cookbook” in nature, many times with value analogous to the value of lead.

Reputation Matters
You never know the quality of a conference presentation until you attend it. That’s too often too late. If you’re not good, and participants rate you low, the next time you apply to present at a convention of the same sponsor, there’s a chance you won’t be selected. I know that because I was in charge of the “Sessions Committee” when the NSTA National Convention came to San Diego in 2002.
That system works the other way for presenters with good reviews. I’ve never submitted session proposals and not had at least one accepted. In fact, it wasn’t long before I developed a following. I’d recognize people from previous years when I presented in the same region.
“I always check the program. If I see your name, I put that session on my schedule,” was not an uncommon greeting I received.
I also had people stop by to apologize because they couldn’t attend my session due to school or district-mandated sessions.

My largest audience was over 300.
This was the first presentation I did. I did it with my colleague Owen Miller. It was at an NSTA Regional Convention in Texas. We figured if we had 30 people show up, that’d be a good attendance. We brought 40 copies of our 20-page handout with us . . . just in case. We underestimated our draw because of a perfect storm of circumstances.
* Our session was during the first session slot of the convention.
* It was the only session for secondary teachers.
* We were in an auditorium.
* The title was: Science at “C” Level: A Creative, Cooperative, Cross-disciplinary Approach to Critical Thinking

The smallest audience was one.
This was at the national convention for the Association of Christian Schools International. I forget the title of the session. I know it concentrated on teacher/student interaction and didn’t emphasize infusing Biblical content.
My attendee and I chatted for 45 of our allotted 60-minutes. She was happy. I was glad she came.

Closing comments on this post.
I only went to one conference where I didn’t present. It was an NSTA conference in Washington, D.C. Because the Grossmont Union High School District was paying for the trip, I felt obligated to attend as many sessions as I could.
Over three days I attended 13 sessions. I collected handouts and took notes. By the end of the third day, I was on content overload. My advice to teachers who ask about conferences that they when they pick sessions that they need to allow time between to get from one to the next and to decompress.
“If you come back with one or two good ideas and implement at least one of them, you had a successful conference experience. The reality is that you’d never successfully implement more than two new ideas/procedures into a course in a single year. Trying to implement more than two ideas will lead to frustration on the part of both teacher and students.”
If you wondered why school reform efforts have a dismal track record, re-read the previous paragraph.


Next Almanac is Deeper Thoughts on Presenting at Conferences

Thursday, March 15, 2018

MVHS Baccalaureate Address: Put Up or Shut Up! The Finale

Put up or Shut up


Welcome back. If you missed part one, follow this link.
After a brief scene setting up the action . . . the conclusion.

King Ahab summons all his heathen clergy members. 450 prophets of Baal and 400 prophets of Asherah head for Mt Carmel. Hundreds of citizens of Israel join tag along to see what’s up.
On the top of the Mountain, they meet Elijah.

21 Elijah went before the people and said, “How long will you waver between two opinions? If the LORD is God, follow him; but if Baal is God, follow him.”
But the people said nothing.
22 Then Elijah said to them, “I am the only one of the LORD’s prophets left, but Baal has four hundred and fifty prophets. 23 Get two bulls for us. Let Baal’s prophets choose one for themselves, and let them cut it into pieces and put it on the wood but not set fire to it. I will prepare the other bull and put it on the wood but not set fire to it. 24 Then you call on the name of your god, and I will call on the name of the LORD. The god who answers by [sending] fire—he is God.” Then all the people said, “What you say is good.” 1 Kings 18:21-24

The conclusion starts here!

The prophets of Baal and Asherah cry and pray all morning.

There’s no answer.

At noon Elijah begins to make fun of them. Perhaps their god is "daydreaming, or on a trip, or in the restroom, or even sleeping. He suggests they cry louder to awaken him.

The false prophets do just that. They even cut themselves with knives and rocks to show their sincerity through mid-afternoon.

Still no answer.

Finally, the prophets collapse from exhaustion.

Elijah rebuilds the Altar of God, digs a trench around it, puts the wood on the altar, cuts the sacrificial bull into pieces and lays them on the wood. Then he calls for four large jars, maybe 10 gallons each, of water. Don't forget we are in the third year of a drought, so even finding water is a chore.

Not satisfied by the dampness created by 40 gallons of water, Elijah calls for four more, then four more! The water soaked the bull, the wood, the rocks of the altar, and filled up the trench around the altar.

Remember, the God who answers by FIRE is to be declared the true God. Elijah has Heavy-duty faith.

Elijah prays:
“LORD, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Israel, let it be known today that you are God in Israel and that I am your servant and have done all these things at your command. Answer me, LORD, answer me, so these people will know that you, LORD, are God, and that you are turning their hearts back again.”  (I Kings 18: J6-J7)


THE FIRE COMES DOWN and consumes EVERYTHING.


During the baccalaureate address, I used flash paper at this point. It looked something like this. It’s an impressive display that leaves the audience looking for more.

The spectators proclaim God as their God.
The false prophets are all killed.
It even begins to rain, ending the drought.

When God puts up, He PUTS UP!

Back at the palace of Ahab and Jezebel, Ahab describes the carnage to Jezebel. She swears to kill Elijah.

Elijah has just had the awesome power of the Living God demonstrated at his request on Mt Carmel. Yet,
Elijah was afraid and ran for his life. When he came to Beersheba in Judah, he left his servant there, while he himself went a day’s journey into the wilderness. He came to a broom bush, sat down under it and prayed that he might die. “I have had enough, LORD,” he said. “Take my life; I am no better than my ancestors.” (1 Kings 19:3-4)

Why do you suppose that he would do that?

Because he’s just like of us. If it’s not happening now, we panic.

There he went into a cave and spent the night. And the word of the LORD came to him: “What are you doing here, Elijah?”
He replied, “I have been very zealous for the LORD God Almighty. The Israelites have rejected your covenant, torn down your altars, and put your prophets to death with the sword. I am the only one left, and now they are trying to kill me too.” (I Kings 19: 9-10)

At this
The LORD said, “Go out and stand on the mountain in the presence of the LORD, for the LORD is about to pass by.” Then a great and powerful wind tore the mountains apart and shattered the rocks before the LORD, but the LORD was not in the wind. After the wind there was an earthquake, but the LORD was not in the earthquake. After the earthquake came a fire, but the LORD was not in the fire. And after the fire came a gentle whisper. (1 Kings 19:11-12)

God has effectively said, "OK. I have put up, now it is time for you to shut up and LISTEN."

He spoke to Elijah in a still, small voice. Elijah had to listen to hear God speak to him.

Today if you hear a still, small voice, someone might make an appointment with a psychiatrist for you. Not only that, not all small voices are God speaking.

How can you know God is speaking to you?

  • Through the Bible. Read it. It's good stuff.
  • Through Christian acquaintances. Listen to the experiences of others.
  • Through those who preach the Word of God, the Good News.
  • And maybe even through Biology teachers who give baccalaureate addresses like this one.


You may be saying, “So now I know that God can speak to me and how He can speak. What do I do when I hear from Him?”

Each of us has a mind, emotions and a will—three separate and distinct parts of what makes you you.

This next section is the “real magic trick” I did that day. Watch the video to see how it looks when you get to the link.

The RED scarf represents your mind, the YELLOW scarf, your emotions, and the BLUE scarf, your will. They’re all housed in your body, this clear tube.

Pressures push against us from all sides. Sometimes we feel like we should PUT UP so everyone else would SHUT UP. <PUSH THE UNCONNECTED SCARVES OUT OF THE TUBE WITH A STICK.> We end up disjointed, as disjointed as we were when we started.

But, if we allow God to control our lives, we can allow Him to control, in turn, our mind (stuff RED in the tube), our emotions (stuff YELLOW in the tube), and our will (stuff BLUE in the tube).

When we listen to the still small voice, even though we still have the pressures pushing against us, we find that those three parts of our lives form ONE SPIRIT (WATCH THE TRICK!).

This unified spirit can join with God's Spirit, and you can know that we are God's children.

As God's children, we have both rewards and responsibilities. We become heirs with Christ in the fabulous riches of God. This is our inheritance. We must also accept the responsibility to become "doers of the word and not hearers only."

So, should you put up or shut up?

To rephrase the title of this address:

Shut up and LISTEN to God . . . today, tomorrow, and each tomorrow that follows.
Then . . .
Put up and DO what God has for you to do.

Thank you, and God bless you!

Next Timeless Truth: Keep Your Distance. 

Follow me on Twitter: @CRDowningAuthor and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CRDowningAuthor
My website is: www.crdowning.com

I'd appreciate your feedback as a comment on Blogger!

Tuesday, March 13, 2018

C.R.Downing's Book Tour 2018. Book #2 INSECTICIDE

Book #2:
There is a link to Amazon for the title book in the line above this. Additional links are provided to original short stories involved in the development of the title book in the description of each story below.

Elevator Speech
Insecticide is the story of a bipolar planet. Bafwique is shattered into two planets by a meteorite. Civil wars, genocide, deception, exploration, and other struggles on and between the two planets lead to a search for a new home for the Clurn.

Background
INSECTICIDE began as a 4,200-word story. I suspect it was written sometime in the mid-1980s.

Even before I signed the contract to have Traveler’s HOT L published, I’d submitted a manuscript titled RIFTS to two publishers. Neither responded favorably, so the book became my first CreateSpace publication.


The photo below illustrates the similarities between RIFTS and INSECTICIDE. Both are iterations of the same manuscript.

The cover is the work of Alison Long, one of my students at Great Oak High. She is the model for Alis’o of Bafwique, artist spouse of Sar’a, one of Bafwique’s military heroes. In real life, Sarah Victor is Alison’s best friend. She’s also a brilliant researcher at UCSD.

The original INSECTICIDE ended with the main characters—giant insects—leaving a planet they’d hoped to invade after a crushing defeat. I’d considered having the invaders win, so I wrote ending #2, where they defeat the inhabitants by using a chemical to suffocate them. Both those endings are reprised in the novel.

RIFTS became the title after much soul-searching. Ultimately, this was the rationale I used to change the title.

Part 1 begins with the splitting of a bi-lobed planet into two words by a meteorite strike and records the formation of two distinct Clurn cultures. (RIFT #1) The Clurn on the half of the planet now called Narxon, are a militaristic society implement a plan to regain control of what they consider to be “their true home,” the other half of the original planet, still known as Bafwique.

Part 2 chronicles an invasion of Bafwique by the Narxonians. (RIFT #2) A civil war between invaders and the native Bafwiqueians follows the invasion. (RIFT #3) Part 2 ends with the reconciliation of the two Clurn civilizations.

Part 3 records events of the two millennia following the reconciliation. Included in this part are the search for, the location of, and the subsequent invasion of the planet designated as the new home of the Clurn. (RIFT #4)

This unconventional history ends on the bridge of a Clurn Colony Quest class space vessel as it first arrives at The Blue Planet. The Clurn appear to be defeated by dominant life form—bipedal mammals known to the local arthropods as humans. Bowed, but not broken, the Clurn retreat to Bafwique, regroup and return to The Blue Planet with renewed conviction and unique weaponry. Their goal is simple: rid the Blue Sphere chosen as the replacement for Bafwique of its human inhabitants.

The eradication of the humans from The Blue Planet disturbs the indigenous arthropod population, which begins to plan its own resistance movement for the time the Clurn return en masse. (RIFT #5)

It is a clever device. It’s also totally worthless as a sales pitch. I did a search on Amazon after this book had been published for over a year. RIFTS generated over 4000 items. My book appeared on page 100 of the search.

I searched for INSECTICIDE. There were two entries. Both were pest control items.

I switched the title.

In the original short synopsis, from which the blue text above was taken included this, too.
The account of an alien conquest of humans, RIFTS backfills the story of an expedition of the alien race known as Clurn as they search for and “conquer” a new homeworld after it becomes clear that the sun is dying. Researched with the help of the Intergalactic Alliance Archives, RIFTS includes nearly thirty source documents that support the narrative.

It’s still true. When I changed the name, I reorganized the front matter and deemphasized the book as what I’d originally called “an unconventional history of a planet.” The new emphasis is on the story. The source documents are still there—they were too cool to toss.


The next stop on this tour is Part 2 of this description. Details on inspiration and a glimpse at how the story now overlaps a soon to be published short story are the highlights.

Follow me on Twitter: @CRDowningAuthor and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CRDowningAuthor
My website is: www.crdowning.com



I'd appreciate your feedback as a comment on Blogger!