Almanac. Why my California ballot is soooo large. Part 2. More on Federal government

This sample ballot is from California's 2016 Presidential Election. The number of propositions on the ballot is representative of the problem that exists in this state. In what has become all too easy access to placing measures (propositions) on the ballot, elected officials are neglecting their duties as representatives of the people.

Disclaimer
This was originally going to be a two-part series on California's love affair with ballot propositions. However, as I began thinking/writing, I decided to expand the focus. As of 1/28/2019, I predict a total of four parts to this series. 
Parts one and two will look at democracy and America. Part three will tackle the evolution of the career politician. Only part four will deal directly with the title. Remaining parts will post on every other Tuesday through February 12.

If you did not read the first blog in this series, here’s the link. I recommend you take a few minutes to read as background for this post.

https://crdowning-author.blogspot.com/2019/01/almanac-why-my-california-ballot-is.html

As I write this post, portions of the Federal Government just reopened after being shut down for 35 days. The reopening is funded for three weeks while congress and the President “negotiate border security.”

Eight hundred thousand government workers, including Coast Guard personnel, went unpaid while our elected officials (House, Senate, President) bickered over funding for one of the President’s favored projects. I saw photos of Coast Guard families and other civil servants in food stamp lines. News stories included interviews with furloughed individuals revealed their dependence on food banks and other charitable groups to keep food on the table. I suspect much of that was to use whatever money was available for housing payments.

HOWEVER, EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THOSE WHO CAUSED THIS SHUTDOWN CONTINUED TO COLLECT THEIR PAYCHECKS. I suspect that their staff didn’t miss a paycheck either.

How did such an event occur in “the greatest democracy in the world?”

Shouldn’t the democratic process be able to deal with disagreements without coercion by either legislative or executive branches? [Note. I did not capitalize legislative or executive on purpose. I don’t think either is doing their job to CAPITALIZED expectations.]

Short answers to the above questions are

Q1. How did such an event occur in “the greatest democracy in the world?”

Answer.

Part 1. Ego.

To be President of the United States requires a sizeable ego. Read biographies of past presidents. You’ll find that at least a super majority of them had sizeable egos. The egos of some were gigantic—even though several of those appeared less egotistical in public.

America elected Donald Trump President. Media today vilify him because he lost the popular vote. (Four other presidents were elected without winning the popular vote. 1824: John Quincy Adams, 1876: Rutherford B. Hayes, 1888: Benjamin Harrison, and 2000: George W. Bush were all elected with fewer popular votes than their opponents.) He’s also brash and abrasive. He is not incompetent and has done nothing impeachable. His ego has to be among the top two or three in presidential history.

It’s a good thing that Washington, D.C., is as close as it is to the equator. Otherwise the collective egos of the major players in the Senate and House would be enough to change the tilt of the Earth on its axis. When major “news” outlets report items under a headline like this: Breaking News! How Minority Leader thinks there might be a scandal beginning over _____” You can fill in the blank.  When did include what someone thinks? Particularly about something that (s)he thinks might happen?

Ego.

Part 2. Power.

Far too many elected officials barter and otherwise abuse the power the system generates for them. The saying

Power corrupts.

Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

has never been truer. Let's hope we never reach the second line, although absolute power does not appear to be the mandatory prerequisite to absolute corruption as it was in Napoleon's days. 

Q2. Shouldn’t the democratic process be able to deal with disagreements without coercion by either legislative or executive branches?

Answer.

Over time, the conscious manipulation of circumstances by incumbents and a laissez-faire attitude from the electorate corrupted the process. What the United States of American had now is a self-appointed governmental aristocracy who function outside the laws of the country and force those laws on the populace.

Congress members and senators have different health care and pension systems that are only theirs. Neither of those systems remotely resembles the health care system and Social Security system mandated for the electorate by legislation.

I’ll present my thoughts on the concept of career politicians in Part 3.

The next Expressions of Faith is Listen

Follow me on Twitter: @CRDowningAuthor and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CRDowningAuthor

My website is: www.crdowning.com

I'd appreciate your feedback on Blogger!

Patterns on Pages - Traveler's HOT L Vol. 4. Book 8 in my Book Tour. Conclusion

Patterns on Pages

Secrets of the sequenced symbols - Traveler's HOT L - Volume 4

There is a link to Amazon for the title book in each blog.

Rey

5.0 out of 5 stars Intriguing, entertaining and you'll have a tough time putting it down

October 13, 2017

Format: Kindle EditionVerified Purchase

As I read this, natural catastrophes abound, seemed a little prophetic...timing is everything! That said, unlike it's predecessors this volume of The Hot L is a single story built off the previous storyline. I really enjoyed the characters! You'll follow them through travels in history and into a future that you can't help but see in your mind's eye. No spoilers. The story can stand on its own but I recommend the series~ he needs to keep writing. Well paced and thought-provoking read.

The price of this eBook is $4.99; Paperback is $9.99. 

This story is new. There is no old version to which you can compare it. I offer the following document as a significant factor in the production of this novella.  

Elevator Speech

    
    The Day the Earth Shattered, the catastrophic seismic event is worse than anyone predicted. Eighty percent of humans die from destruction, disease, starvation, and suicide. Civilization is erased. 
    Live the struggle as five alien Time Synchronizers for Earth recruit illiterate two humans from the far future and return them to “this time” where two teachers begin a long overdue lesson. 
    Can the recruits return and decipher the patterns on pages of books in the NoCal’s only Li’bry and save humanity?

The Story

The book begins with a series of vignettes chronicling disasters "The Day the Earth Shattered" caused. Here's the one that was edited out of the book... but onto the back cover. 

   It was “the season” and cruise ships were scattered throughout the coastal waters of northern Europe and Scandinavia. Thelma and Florence were strolling the Lido deck as they waited for their seating time in the Royal Hall for dinner.
   “Isn’t this pleasant,” Thelma said.
   “Quite. Oh, wait. Do you see that?” Florence pointed to a swell off the port side.
   “My, but that’s a bit of a large one, isn’t it?”
   Before Florence could respond, the massive Jewel of the Fjords slid down into the trough that preceded the arrival of a tsunami. All three thousand seven hundred and nineteen souls aboard reached for something to hold onto.

   Within a minute, the cruise ship rose, flipped, and landed upside down in the icy waters of the North Sea. Fifty-foot-high walls of water washed away coastal cities in northern Europe, the United Kingdom, and Scandinavia. Portions of reinforced military structures were all that remained after the floodwaters receded.

As I considered other consequences, I suspected that public education would be a low priority in a world where survival itself is questionable. Since that was a valid concern, how would luxuries like reading be sustained? I decided learning to read would become so uncommon that the value of books would be far as sources of energy for cooking and heating.

In my apocalypse, there are pockets of humans where time synchronizers Tempus and Epoch hope to find individuals to return to what is our present. Once in the 21st century, they learn to read and gain perspective on the world as a whole.

NorCal is the first population selected for this training. One factor influencing the choice is the presence of a Lib'ry full of books of all kinds.

Tempus and Epoch break Traveler's HOT L rules to convince Marin and Lincoln to return to the past. They have less trouble convincing Dawn, a second-grade teacher, and Courtney, a high school history teacher, to help the time travelers.

Learning to read, trying to navigate sinks and toilets, flying from the west coast to Washington, DC, visiting Monticello in the 1800s, along with cramming a lifetime of ideas into less than one month of real-time sets the stage for the future-dwellers return to their home time.

Here's an example of something you might not have thought about.

   Courtney and Dawn sat in armchairs in their room at the HOT L. Lincoln and Marin sat on the edge of the bed facing

them.

   “Can-I-ask-one-last-question?” Marin asked, her words running together in her haste to be heard before she was separated from her teachers for the last time.

   “Is something wrong?” Dawn asked.

   “I . . . I don’t know.”

   “Ask your question,” Lincoln said.

   Marin turned toward him. He nodded.

   “Why do so many stars hide from the people in your cities?”

   “Oh, Marin, the stars aren’t—”

   “It’s the lights,” Courtney interrupted. “You can’t see the stars because of what’s called ‘light pollution.’ Some stars are

brighter than other stars. Most cities have many, many lights on all night. So many lights are on that it brightens part of the sky and you can’t see the less bright stars.”

   The looks on the faces of Marin and Lincoln were visual testimony of their lack of understanding.

   “Help me here, please,” Courtney said to Dawn.

I invite you to live the experience of four lifetimes. Take a trip from the future to your present and your past and back again. After all, you need to find out how well Marin and Lincoln fulfill their assignments!

Follow me on 

Twitter: @CRDowningAuthor

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/chuck-downing-97595266/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CRDowningAuthor

My website is: www.crdowning.com

Email: crd.author@gmail.com

My Blogs

Life as I see it. Topics rotate between those of general interest to lovers of life,  authors, teachers—probably you, too.  Posts on Tuesdays and some Mondays.  http://crdowning-author.blogspot.com/?alt=rss

My Christian Context. Posts M/W of discussion questions. Thursdays - Timeless Truths. Fridays - Expressions of Faith. https://mychristiancontext.blogspot.com/  

I'd appreciate your feedback on Blogger!

Almanac. Why my California ballot is soooo large. Part 1. Background

This sample ballot is from California's 2016 Presidential Election. The number of propositions on the ballot is representative of the problem that exists in this state. In what has become all too easy access to placing measures (propositions) on the ballot, elected officials are neglecting their duties as representatives of the people.

Disclaimer
This was originally going to be a two-part series on California's love affair with ballot propositions. However, as I began thinking/writing, I decided to expand the focus. As of 1/8/2019, I predict a total of four parts to this series. 
Parts one and two will look at democracy and America. Part three will tackle the evolution of the career politician. Only part four will deal directly with the ballot size portion of the title. One part will post on every other Tuesday starting today, January 15.

Background
Types of Democracy is from   https://resources.saylor.org/wwwresources/archived/site/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/POLSC221-4.1.5-TypesDem-FINAL.pdf  There is some editing in format but none in content.

Types of Democracy

The democratic form of government is an institutional configuration that allows for popular participation through the electoral process. According to political scientist Robert Dahl, the democratic ideal is based on two principles: political participation and political contestation. Political participation requires that all the people who are eligible to vote can vote. Elections must be free, fair, and competitive. Once the votes have been cast and the winner announced, power must be peacefully transferred from one individual to another. These criteria are to be replicated on a local, state, and national level. A more robust conceptualization of democracy emphasizes what Dahl refers to as political contestation. Contestation refers to the ability of people to express their discontent through freedom of the speech and press. People should have the ability to meet and discuss their views on political issues without fear of persecution from the state. Democratic regimes that guarantee both electoral freedoms and civil rights are referred to as liberal democracies. 

In the subfield of Comparative Politics, there is a rich body of literature dealing specifically with the intricacies of the democratic form of government. These scholarly works draw distinctions between democratic regimes based on representative government, the institutional balance of power, and the electoral procedure. There are many shades of democracy, each of which has its own benefits and disadvantages. Types of Democracy The broadest differentiation that scholars make between democracies is based on the nature of representative government. There are two categories: direct democracy and representative democracy. We can identify examples of both in the world today. 

Direct Democracy 
Direct democracy places all power in the hands of the individual. When political decisions must be made, all members of a polity gather together and individuals cast a vote. In theory, this sounds like the ideal form of government. There are no intermediaries. Each person is treated as an equal, and each person is given a chance to directly influence the policymaking process. In practice, however, this system is hard to implement. Historically, small political communities tend to use direct democracy. In small towns or indigenous communities where everyone knows one another and the issues under debate directly affect them, such an arrangement is ideal. However, once there is an expansion in the size of the electorate and the scope of policy areas, direct democracy can become unwieldy. In America today, thousands of laws are implemented and repealed on a daily basis. Applying a direct democracy framework in this type of political environment would be quite difficult.

Representative Democracy 
As political communities change and evolve, so does our understanding of how democracy should be implemented. The second major type of democracy is referred to as representative democracy. This political arrangement establishes an intermediary political actor between the individual and the policy outputs of the state. Through the electoral process, one person or a group of people are elected and assigned with the task of making decisions on behalf of the group of citizens that they represent. In the United States, we have multiple intermediaries. Each state has two representatives in the upper house or Senate. In the lower house or House of Representatives, the number of intermediaries appointed is based on the population size of each state. It is important to note that while the power of the individual is diminished slightly, political representatives are still beholden to the group that they represent, also known as their “constituency.” In the US, members of both the House of Representatives and Senate face regular elections, during which the public evaluates their performance. If citizens are pleased, then it is expected that the representative will be re-elected. This repetitive process creates a relationship of accountability between voters and those that they put into power. Electoral defeat serves as a deterrent to a politician’s temptation to err from the preferences of his or her constituency. 

The creation of the intermediary role begs the following questions: 

1. What does it really mean to be a representative of the interests of a collective of individuals? 
2. What if the set of policies that voters want does not really serve their interests? 
3. What should the representative do? 

Some scholars argue that it is the responsibility of the elected representative to carry out the wishes of the constituency, even if it harms them. This is known as the “delegate model.” Conversely, some argue that politicians are specialists. While voters continue to engage in their everyday lives, politicians are in the thick of congressional debates. They understand the intricacies and implications of policies more than their constituents ever could, so in some circumstances, political leaders should be given the benefit of the doubt. This model is known as the “trustee model.” The trustee model does not mean that voter-representative accountability is unimportant; rather, it recognizes asymmetries in information and knowledge that exist between the public at large and elected officials. One could argue that it is actually impossible to represent the interest of every voter. Consequently, all representatives are trustees as they must make educated guesses about what their power base would want and should want. Sometimes representatives will be right, and sometimes they will be wrong. What is important is that we place our trust in their ability to make rational and well-informed decisions. The electoral process responds to a representative’s failure (real or perceived) by most likely removing the representative from office.

The boldface questions and the bolded red sentence are the targets for the next one or two posts.

What happened to the government of the United States over time is candidly described in the column below. You might have read a version of this on social media. What follows is the original text of the column. BTW, it was not the author's "final column."

(This column was originally published in the Orlando Sentinel on Feb. 3, 1984.)

545 vs. 300,000,000 People

By Charlie Reese

Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them.

Have you ever wondered why, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, we have deficits? Have you ever wondered why, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, we have inflation and high taxes?

You and I don't propose a federal budget. The president does. You and I don't have the constitutional authority to vote n appropriations. The House of Representatives does. You and I don't write the tax code. The Congress does. You and I don't set fiscal policy. the Congress does. You and I don't control monetary policy. The Federal Reserve Bank does.

One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one president, and nine Supreme Court justices - 545 human beings out of 238 million- are directly, legally, morally and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.

I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Bank because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered but private central bank.

I exclude all of the special interest and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman or a president to do one cotton-picking thing. I don't care if they offer a politician $1 million in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it.

No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator's responsibility to determine how he votes.

Don't you see now the con game that is played on the people by the politicians? Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. they cooperate in this common con regardless of party.

What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of Tip O'Neill, who stood up and criticized Ronald Reagan for creating deficits.

The president can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept. it. The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating appropriations and taxes. O'Neill is speaker of the House. He is the leader of the majority party. He and his fellow Democrats, not the president, can approve any budget they want. If the president vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto.

Just 545 Americans have fouled up this great nation.

It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 235 million cannot replace 545 people who stand convicted - by present facts - of incompetence and irresponsibility.

I can't think of a single domestic problem, from an unfair tax code to defense overruns, that is not traceable directly to those people.

When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise complete power over the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.

If the tax code is unfair, it's because they want it unfair. If the budget is in the red, it's because they want it in the red. If the Marines are in Lebanon, it's because they want them in Lebanon.

There are no insoluble government problems. Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take it.

Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exist disembodied mystical force like "the economy," "inflation" or "politics" that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.

Those 545 people and they alone are responsible. They and they alone have the power. they and they alone should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses - provided they have the gumption to manage their own employees.

Charley Reese was a crotchety libertarian columnist for the Orlando Sentinal for many years.

Conclusion #1

Many, if not nearly all, problems in what is called American politics are the results of actions of that government. The problems were not problems until the government decided they were problems after creating the situations through legislation.

The next Almanac - in two weeks - is Why my California ballot is soooo large. Part 2. More on Federal government

Follow me on Twitter: @CRDowningAuthor and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CRDowningAuthor

My website is: www.crdowning.com

I'd appreciate your feedback on Blogger!